140 Bibliography Hjorth, F. (2016). Who benefits? Welfare chauvinism and national stereotypes. European Union Politics, 17(1), 3-24 Huddleston, T., Bilgili, O., Joki, A.-L., & Vankova, Z. (2015). Migrant Integration Policy Index 2015. Retrieved from http://www.mipex.eu/what-is-mipex Iversen, T. (2001). The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, Deindustrialization and Partisan Politics. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State (pp. 45-79). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Iversen, T., & Cusack, T. R. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics, 52(3), 313-349. Jaime-Castillo, A. M., & Sáez-Lozano, J. L. (2016). Preferences for tax schemes in OECD countries, self-interest and ideology. International Political Science Review, 37(1), 81-98. Jensen, C. (2011). Less bad than its reputation: Social spending as a proxy for welfare effort in cross-national studies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13(3), 327-340. Jørgensen, M. B., & Thomsen, T. L. (2016). Deservingness in the Danish context: Welfare chauvinism in times of crisis. Critical Social Policy, 36(3), 330-351. Kahanec, M., Pytliková, M., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2014). The Free Movement of Workers in an Enlarged European Union: Institutional Underpinnings of Economic Adjustment (No. DP No. 8456). Bonn. Koikkalainen, S. (2011). Free movement in Europe: Past and present. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/ article/free-movement-europe-past-and-present Koopmans, R. (2009). Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(1), 1-26. Kraler, A., Reichel, D., & Entzinger, H. (2015). Migration statistics in Europe: A core component of governance and population research. In P. Scholten et al. (Eds.), Integrating immigrants in Europe (pp. 39-58). Springer. Kropko, J., & Kubinec, R. (2018). Why the two-way fixed effects model is difficult to interpret, and what to do about it. Social Science Research Network. Kvist, J. (2004). Does EU enlargement start a race to the bottom? Strategic interaction among EU member states in social policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(3), 301-318. Laczko, F. (2015). Factoring migration into the “development data revolution.” Journal of International Affairs, 68(2), 1-17. Larsen, C. A. (2011). Ethnic heterogeneity and public support for welfare: Is the American experience replicated in Britain, Sweden and Denmark? Scandinavian Political Studies, 34(4), 332-353. Larsen, C. A. (2020). The institutional logic of giving migrants access to social benefits and services. Journal of European Social Policy, 30(1), 48-62. Larsen, C. A., & Dejgaard, T. E. (2013). The institutional logic of images of the poor and welfare recipients: A comparative study of British, Swedish and Danish newspapers. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(3), 287-299. Lemaitre, G. (2005). The comparability of international migration statistics: Problems and prospects. OECD. Lemaitre, G., Liebig, T., Thoreau, C., & Fron, P. (2007). Standardised statistics on immigrant inflows: Results, sources and methods. OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/migration/mig/38832099.pdf
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw