42 Chapter 2 APPENDIX Appendix A Institutional context 43 Table A1. Datasets used from Statistics Netherlands Microdata 46 Table A2. Selection of the study population 47 Table A3. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores 48 Table A4. DSM-IV diagnoses studied 49 Table A5. Final GAF: Alternative outcomes and subpopulations 50 Table A6. Income gradients by gender 51 Table A7. Household income gradients in the reason of record closure 52 Table A8. Income gradients by diagnosis: Depressive disorders, Anxiety disorders and Other disorders 53 Table A9. Severity at baseline assessment (GAF category) – alternative specifications 55 Table A10. Treatment minutes (natural logarithm)– alternative specifications 56 Table A11. Functional improvement – alternative specifications 57 Table A12. Additional treatment record – alternative specifications 58 Table A13. Income gradients in severity at baseline assessment, treatment intensity, functional improvement, and additional treatment record: primary diagnosis at 2nd level DSM-IV 59 Table A14. Income gradients in severity at baseline assessment, treatment intensity, functional improvement, and additional treatment record: controlling for a proxy of addiction 60 Table A15. Income gradients in functional improvement, and additional treatment record: controlling for type of therapy and logistic regression 61 Table A16. Income gradients in severity at baseline assessment, treatment intensity, functional improvement, and additional treatment record: 2011 to 2014 62 Figure A1. Flow diagram of study population 63 Figure A2 – Distribution of treatment minutes trimmed at 99 percentile 64 Figure A3 – Distribution change in GAF – number of intervals increase/decrease by the end of treatment record 64
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw