194 Chapter 6 REFERENCES 1. The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2021. NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2021. Available: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2021/summary/. Accessed: 23 Nov 2021. 2. Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2012;66(12):1182-6. 3. Petticrew M, Cummins S, Ferrell C, Findlay A, Higgins C, Hoy C, et al. Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health? Public Health. 2005;119(9):751-7. 4. Ogilvie D, Adams J, Bauman A, Gregg EW, Panter J, Siegel KR, et al. Using natural experimental studies to guide public health action: turning the evidence-based medicine paradigm on its head. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2020;74(2):203-8. 5. de Vocht F, Katikireddi SV, McQuire C, Tilling K, Hickman M, Craig P. Conceptualising natural and quasi experiments in public health. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2021;21(1):32. 6. Been JV, Sheikh A. COVID-19 must catalyse key global natural experiments. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1):010104. 7. Academy of Medical Sciences London. Improving the health of the public by 2040. 2016. 8. Miguel AH. The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data. American Journal of Public Health. 2018;108(5):616-9. 9. Matthay EC, Hagan E, Gottlieb LM, Tan ML, Vlahov D, Adler NE, et al. Alternative causal inference methods in population health research: Evaluating tradeoffs and triangulating evidence. SSM - Population Health. 2020;10:100526. 10. Ogilvie D, Egan M, Hamilton V, Petticrew M. Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(10):886-92.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw