182 Chapter 5 Table A2. Comparison of within-between random effects model (main) and model without GP utilization rate and patient list size. REWB Main without GP utilization rate and patient list size (1) REWB Main (2) Psychologists/100,000 patients Within-term -0.301 -0.305 [-0.706,0.103] [-0.706,0.0954] -0.301 -0.305 Between-term -0.909* -0.955** [-1.620,-0.197] [-1.641,-0.269] Year dummies Yes Yes GP covariates Yes Yes GP practice covariates Yes Yes Local context covariates** Yes Yes Constant 27.89 [-44.47,100.3] 22.45 [-48.56,93.46] N 17210 17210 R2 Within 0.0720 0.0756 Notes: The dependent variable is the share of adults with depression in the GP list that has antidepressant therapy *Covariates are included in the model demeaned and centered (e.g. for each covariate two terms are included, one with the mean over the study period and other with the difference from the mean in each year). **Some of the covariates are reported at the municipality level, which correspond roughly to the local group geographical boundaries. 95% confidence intervals in brackets. Standard errors clustered at the local group level (55 local groups in all models). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. REWB – within between random effects model;
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw