46 Chapter 2 Supplementary Table 3. Continued. SRTM R1 (0-60/80-130) HC AD r2 Slope r2 Slope Cubic SRTM R1 (0-50/80-100) 0.98 1.01 0.98 1.01 SRTM R1 (0-40/80-100) 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.01 SRTM R1 (0-30/80-100) 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.01 Linear SRTM R1 (0-50/80-100) 0.98 1.01 0.98 1.01 SRTM R1 (0-40/80-100) 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.01 SRTM R1 (0-30/80-100) 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.01 Exponential SRTM R1 (0-50/80-100) 0.97 1.01 0.98 1.01 SRTM R1 (0-40/80-100) 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 SRTM R1 (0-30/80-100) 0.95 1.02 0.96 1.01 Supplementary Table 4. RPM R1 obtained with the shortened time interval (0-30/80100) compared to SRTM R1 and RPM R1 derived from the original scan duration (0-60/80-130). SRTM R1 (0-60/80-130) RPM R1 (0-60/80-130) HC AD HC AD r2 Slope r2 Slope r2 Slope r2 Slope POP-IP 2T4k_VB RPM R1 (0-30/80-100) 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.01 Cubic RPM R1 (0-30/80-100) 0.97 1.01 0.97 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.01 The correspondence of RPM R1 with SRTM R1 for the original scan duration was r2 = 0.92, slope=0.95 for HC and r2 = 0.94, slope=0.96 for AD subjects.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw