Chapter 6 166 baseline (T0=10.73) and mid-intervention (T1=10.43), which is in line with the expected direction in changes. Group B (opposite action) Because of the consistently small sample size in Group B during the entire two-week training protocol (T0=5, T1=2, T2=2), the quantitative results regarding the impact of the opposite action exercise on positive affect, negative affect, and emotion regulation difficulties are not further elaborated upon (Table 5). Group C (positive reframing) Lastly, it was expected that participants in group C, who received the positive reframing exercise, would experience significantly less difficulties with effectively regulating their emotions once upset, indicated by a significant decrease in strategies subscale scores. In contrast to the study expectations, the results showed no significant decrease in strategies subscale scores in group C throughout the two-week training protocol.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw