147 General Discussion 8 References 1. Marcus DS, Olsen TR, Ramaratnam M, Buckner RL (2007) The extensible neuroimaging archive toolkit: An informatics platform for managing, exploring, and sharing neuroimaging data. Neuroinformatics 5:11–33. https://doi.org/10.1385/NI:5:1:11 2. Data Driven Health: Connect, Share and Reuse | Health-RI. https://www.health-ri.nl/datadriven-health-connect-share-and-reuse. Accessed 8 Jul 2020 3. Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, et al Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2 4. Kassam Z, Lang R, Arya S, et al (2022) Update to the structured MRI report for primary staging of rectal cancer Perspective from the SAR Disease Focused Panel on Rectal and Anal Cancer. 47:3364–3374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03612-3 5. Santiago I, Figueiredo N, Parés O, Matos C MRI of rectal cancer-relevant anatomy and staging key points. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00890-7 6. Nougaret S, Reinhold C, Mikhael HW, et al (2013) The use of MR imaging in treatment planning for patients with rectal carcinoma: Have you checked the “distance.” Radiology 268:330–334. https://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOL.13121361/SUPPL_FILE/RADIOL.13121361.MOVIE3.MP4 7. Alvfeldt G, Aspelin P, Blomqvist L, Sellberg N (2021) Radiology reporting in rectal cancer using MRI: adherence to national template for structured reporting. Acta Radiol. https://doi. org/10.1177/02841851211057276 8. Sahni VA, Silveira PC, Sainani NI, Khorasani R (2015) Impact of a Structured Report Template on the Quality of MRI Reports for Rectal Cancer Staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:584–588. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.14053 9. Nörenberg D, Sommer WH, Thasler W, et al (2017) Structured Reporting of Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Primary Rectal Cancer: Potential Benefits for Surgical Planning and Interdisciplinary Communication. Invest Radiol 52:232–239. https://doi.org/10.1097/ RLI.0000000000000336 10. Bregendahl S, Bondeven P, Grønborg TK, et al (2022) Training of radiology specialists in local staging of primary rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective intervention study exploring the impact of various educational elements on the interpretive performance. BMJ Open Qual 11:. https:// doi.org/10.1136/BMJOQ-2021-001716 11. Sluckin TC, Hazen SMJA, Horsthuis K, et al (2022) Significant improvement after training in the assessment of lateral compartments and short-axis measurements of lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00330-022-08968-0 12. Wang S, Li XT, Zhang XY, et al (2019) MRI evaluation of extramural vascular invasion by inexperienced radiologists. Br J Radiol 92:. https://doi.org/10.1259/BJR.20181055 13. Siddiqui MRS, Gormly KL, Bhoday J, et al (2016) Interobserver agreement of radiologists assessing the response of rectal cancers to preoperative chemoradiation using the MRI tumour regression grading (mrTRG). Clin Radiol 71:854–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. CRAD.2016.05.005 14. van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E, et al (2018) Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. The Lancet 391:. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31078-X 15. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, et al (2004) Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Stage 0 Distal Rectal Cancer Following Chemoradiation Therapy: Long-term Results. Ann Surg 240:711. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SLA.0000141194.27992.32 16. Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, et al (2010) Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 11:835–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70172-8
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw