224 Appendices APPENDIX 5 Survey-after-the-series for MCD-participants This is a specific part for MCD-participants at DCIA, which we added in the postmeasurement of a broader questionnaire (see Appendix 6) for our impact study on MCS (Chapter 4 and 5). Most items are used in the evaluation study of Chapter 3; however, items 6 and a part of the answers of 2B are used for the outcome study in Chapter 6. This is a translated version of the Dutch questionnaire we used at DCIA; the translation was made with the help of a professional translator. Explanation: What is moral case deliberation? A moral case deliberation is a conversation about concrete work-related situations in which questions arise about what is the right thing to do. Questions such as: Should I report it when a colleague doesn’t follow a protocol? Or: May I open a cell door when we are understaffed? In a moral case deliberation, you reflect with a group on these kinds of situations. Together you discuss what you and others think is the right thing to do. A moral case deliberation is conducted with a trained facilitator, and with a step-by-step plan that maps out values, norms and alternative solutions to a dilemma Experiences with moral case deliberation 1. Did you participate in an MCD-session organized within the timeframe of January 2017 and December 2018 in this DCIA-location? a. No -> you may continue to question 8 b. Yes, how often: i. 1 - 3 times ii. 4 - 6 times iii. 7 - 10 times iv. More than 10 times 2. A. How would you evaluate the series of moral case deliberation sessions? a. I am very positive b. I am positive c. I am neutral d. I am negative e. I am very negative B. Can you elaborate on your answer to 2.A? Why do you think so?
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw