221 Appendices 3. The facilitator: Totally disagree / totally agree a. made me feel comfortable speaking freely 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 b. stimulated to listen carefully to each other 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 c. stimulated to ask each other open-questions 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 d. stimulated discussing different opinions/ideas 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 d. stimulated reflection on values and norms 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 4. Overall: Give a score between 1-10: a. How do you rate the quality of the MCD-facilitator: b. How do you rate the conversation method used in this session: c. How do you rate the quality of the dialogue in this session: d. How do you rate the outcome (result or insights) of the conversation for your own work: Evaluation of Moral Case Deliberation session Part 2 To be completed only by the exemplar/case presenter: 1. What was your case and dilemma? Briefly describe the situation and the choice (A and B) at stake. To be completed by all participants: 2.* Did this conversation have anything to offer you? If so, what? Describe it as specifically as possible. 3.* What can you take away from this to your own workplace? For example: will you do something different in the future in this or similar situations / do you want to reflect on this case with colleagues or supervisor(s)? et cetera. 4. Name 1 or 2 points that could be organized differently or better during this MCD-session. 5. Do you have a dilemma or case that you would like to discuss during the next MCD-session? If so, briefly describe the situation and the difficult choice you had to make.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw