Chapter 4 76 8. Simon-Tuval, T., P.J. Neumann, and D. Greenberg, Cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions: a systematic review. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 2016. 16(1): p. 67-84. 9. Hageman, D., H.J.P. Fokkenrood, P.P.M. Essers, M.J.W. Koelema, J.C. Breek, A.C. Vahl, et al., Improved Adherence to a Stepped-care Model Reduces Costs of Intermittent Claudication Treatment in The Netherlands. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2017. 54(1): p. 51-57. 10. Mold, J. Goal-Directed Health Care: Redefining Health and Health Care in the Era of Value-Based Care. Cureus, 2017. 9(2): e1043, DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1043. 11. Cadmus-Bertram, L., M. Irwin, C. Alfano, K. Campbell, C. Duggan, K. FosterSchubert K, et al., Predicting adherence of adults to a 12-month exercise intervention. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 2014. 11(7): p. 1304-1312. 12. Essery, R., A.W. Geraghty, S. Kirby, and L. Yardley L, Predictors of adherence to home-based physical therapies: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil, 2017. 39(6): p. 519-534. 13. Martin, K.A. and A.R. Sinden, Who will stay and who will go? A review of older adults’ adherence to randomized controlled trials of exercise. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 2001. 9(2): p. 91-114. 14. Riley, R.D., K.G.M. Moons, K.I.E. Snell, J. Ensor, L. Hooft, D.G. Altman, et al., A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies. BMJ, 2019. 364: k4597. 15. Hayden, J.A., P. Côté, I.A. Steenstra, and C. Bombardier, Identifying phases of investigation helps planning, appraising, and applying the results of explanatory prognosis studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008. 61: p. 552-560. 16. Page, M.J., J.E. McKenzie, P.M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T.C. Hoffmann, C.D. Mulrow, et al., The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021. 372(71). 17. Centers for Disease Controle and Prevention. About chronic diseases. 2022. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/index.htm (cited May 22, 2022). 18. Harrison, H., S.J. Griffin, I. Kuhn, and J.A. Usher-Smith, Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC medical research methodology, 2020. 20(7). 19. Waffenschmidt, S., M. Knelangen, W. Sieben, S. Buhn, and D. Pieper, Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review. BMC medical research methodology, 2019. 19: 132. 20. Moons, K.G.M., et al., Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist. PLoS Med, 2014. 11(10). 21. Roqué, M., L.M. García, I. Solà, P. Alonso-Coello, X. Bonfill, and J. Zamora, Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 2020. 9(82). 22. Harrer, M., P. Cuijpers, T.A. Furukawa, and D.D. Ebert DD, Doing Meta-Analysis with R: A Hands-On Guide. 2021, Boca Raton, FL and London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. 23. Rao, G., et al., Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw