137 Effectiveness of a social network intervention 5 102 Figure 2. Forensic network coaching flow diagram. a Organized by De Regenboog Groep [The Rainbow Group], an informal care service in Amsterdam. b Both patient- and coach-related personal problems. c Coaches and patients who are matched at least 10 months between baseline and 18-months follow-up assessment. Interventions Treatment as usual Participants allocated to both groups received standard treatment at the outpatient care sites, which consisted of a variety of specific interventions, such as ambulatory psychotherapies (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing, pharmacotherapy), and/or forensic FACT (van Veldhuizen, 2007). Additionally, clinicians of all participants included in our trial received information about a general and brief social network intervention on how to address social network enhancement in treatment. No treatments were withheld from participants. TAU could have been discontinued or terminated by clinicians and/or by participants during the study. Forensic network coaching Participants allocated to the TAU+FNC group were stimulated by researchers and/or clinicians to engage in volunteer coaching to improve the quality of social networks, social support, and social participation in addition to TAU, during 12 months after baseline assessment. The FNC intervention was provided by De Regenboog Groep [The Rainbow Group], an external informal care institute providing volunteer Allocated to TAU + FNC (N=51) Intake appointmenta (N=46) No longer interested (n=3) Unreachable (n=2) Matching (N=40) Matching appointment (N=33) Forensic network coaching (N=32) Completersc (N=16) No longer interested (n=3) No match found (n=2) No longer eligible, crisis (n=1) No longer interested, too occupied (n=3) Housing problems (n=1) No match found (n=1) Unreachable (n=2) No longer interested, too occupied (n=1) No longer interested, too occupied (n=3) Poor compliance, coach withdrew (n=3) Interrupted, personal problemsb (n=3) Unreachable (n=1) Patient did not like the match (n=1) Delayed start with coaching (n=1) Coach withdrew (n=3) Poor compliance (n=1) Figure 2. Forensic network coaching flow diagram. a Organized by De Regenboog Groep [The Rainbow Group], an informal care service in Amsterdam. b Both patient- and coach-related personal problems. c Coaches and patients who are matched at least 10 months between baseline and 18-months follow-up assessment. Interventions Treatment as usual Participants allocated to both groups received standard treatment at the outpatient care sites, which consisted of a variety of specific interventions, such as ambulatory psychotherapies (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing, pharmacotherapy), and/or forensic FACT (vanVeldhuizen, 2007). Additionally, clinicians of all participants included in our trial received information about a general and brief social network intervention on how to address social network enhancement in treatment. No treatments were withheld from participants. TAU could have been discontinued or terminated by clinicians and/or by participants during the study.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw