236 Addendum Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. Edited by Crawford B. Macpherson. Penguin Classics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Holland, Dorothy. 1997. ‘Selves as Cultured: As Told by an Anthropologist Who Lacks a Soul’. In Self and Identity, 160–90. Honneth, Axel. 1992. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by Joel Anderson. Reprinted. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Horton, John. 1993. Liberalism, Multiculturalism and Toleration. Basingstoke: Macmillan. ———. 2003. ‘Rawls, Public Reason, and the Limits of Liberal Justification’. Contemporary Political Theory 2 (1): 5–23. Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer. 2011. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Husserl, Edmund. 1913. Ideas. Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2009. ‘A Vital Human Need: Recognition as Inclusion in Personhood’. European Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (1): 31–45. ———. 2010. ‘Making the Best of What We Are: Recognition as an Ontological and Ethical Concept’. In The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Schmidt, Hans-Christoph and Christopher F. Zurn, Eds., 343–67. Plymouth: Lexington Books. Ikäheimo, Heikki, and Arto Laitinen. 2007. ‘Analyzing Recognition: Identification, Acknowledgement, and Recognitive Attitudes towards Persons’. In Recogntion and Power, Brink, Bert van Den and David Owen, Eds. Jaramillo, Maria Clara, Rousiley C. M. Maia, Simona Mameli, and Jürg Steiner. 2016. ‘Deliberation across Deep Divisions: Transformative Moments’. Belgrade Philosophical Annual 29: 157–78. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Kant, Immanuel. 1788. Kritiek van de Praktische Rede. Amsterdam: Boom. Korostelina, K. V. 2007. Social Identity and Conflict: Structures, Dynamics, and Implications. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon. Laitinen, Arto. 2002. ‘Interpersonal Recognition: A Response to Value or a Pre-Condition to Personhood’. Inquiry 45 (4): 463–78. ———. 2006. ‘Interpersonal Recognition and Responsiveness to Relevant Differences’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (1): 47–70. ———. 2008. Strong Evaluation without Moral Sources: On Charles Taylor’s Philosophical Anthropology and Ethics. Quellen Und Studien Zur Philosophie, Bd. 86. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. ———. 2009. ‘Recognition, Needs and Wrongness’. European Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (1): 13–30. ———. 2010. ‘On the Scope of “Recognition”: The Role of Adequate Regard and Mutuality’. In The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Persepctives, Schmidt, Hans-Christoph and Christopher F. Zurn, Eds., 319–42. Plymouth: Lexington Books. Larmore, Charles. 1990. ‘Political Liberalism’. Political Theory 18 (3): 339–60. ———. 1999. ‘The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism’. The Journal of Philosophy 96 (12): 599–625. ———. 2006. ‘Public Reason’. In Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Freeman, Samuel (Ed.). Leary, Kimberlyn. 2004. ‘Critical Moments as Relational Moments: The Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue and the Conflict in Aceh, Indonesia’. Negotiation Journal, 311–38. LeBaron, Michelle, and Nike Castarphen. 1997. ‘Negotiating Intractable Conflict: The Common Ground Dialogue Process and Abortion’. Negotiation Journal, 341–61. Locke, John. 1689. Two Treatises of Government. New ed., Reprinted. The Everyman Library. London: Dent. Löw-Beer, Martin. 1991. ‘Living a Life and the Problem of Existential Impossibility’. Inquiry 34 (2): 217–36. Macedo, Stephen. 2010. ‘Why Public Reason? Citizens’ Reasons and the Constitution of the Public Sphere’. Manuscript available at the Social Science Research Network. Machiavelli, Nicolò. 1513. De Heerser. Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep. MacIntyre, Alisdair. 1994. ‘Critical Remarks on the Sources of the Self’. Philosopical and Phenomenological Research 54 (1): 187–90. MacKay, Kathryn. 2019. ‘Authenticity and Normative Authority: Addressing the Agency Dilemma with Values of One’s Own’. Journal of Social Philosophy 0 (0): 1–22. Mackenzie, Catriona. 2014. ‘Three Dimensions of Autonomy: A Relational Analysis’. In Autonomy, Oppression and Gender, Veltman, Andrea and Mark Piper, Eds., 15–41. New York: Oxford University Press. Mackenzie, Catriona, and Natalie Stoljar, eds. 2000. Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Automony, Agency, and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw