79 Content analysis | 3 9. Is the provided feedback in line with the purpose of the specific form? No - Themes and topics relevant for the scope of the form and/or the competence at hand are discussed too minimally. - Themes and topics outside the scope of the form and/or the competence at hand are discussed elaborately. Yes - Feedback is confined to the purpose of the form and/or the competence at hand. 10. Are the criteria/source upon which the feedback was based clear? No There is no reasoning and/or funding for the provided feedback. Yes There are things mentioned regarding how the feedback came about. 11. Does the provided feedback give insight in the level the trainee must attain? No The feedback only mentions topics that went right/wrong and/or are in need of extra attention. Yes The feedback (also) mentions what the trainee can do to improve current behaviour. Feedback Supervisor For supervisors preferably the most recent mini-CEX is rated, if this form is not available a Compass-form can be looked into as well. NB: this question was eliminated for definitive rating due to insufficient IRR 12. For which of the competencies is feedback requested? Medical expert Medisch handelen Health advocate Maatschappelijk handelen Communicator Arts-patiënt communicatie Scholar Kennis enwetenschap Collaborator Samenwerken Professional Professionaliteit Leader Organiseren None 13. For which of the competencies is feedback provided? Medical expert Medisch handelen Health advocate Maatschappelijk handelen Communicator Arts-patiënt communicatie Scholar Kennis enwetenschap Collaborator Samenwerken Professional Professionaliteit Leader Organiseren None 14. Is the provided feedback specific enough? No Two or more items (from the statement below) are structurally missing. Yes The ‘what’, ‘where’, ‘when’, ‘who’, ‘why’ and ‘how’ of the feedback is clear.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw