69 Content analysis | 3 Table 3 The percentage of portfolios that met the different SRL criteria for good practice from the codebook. Criterium from the codebook How many portfolios fulfilled the criterium (%) N = 90 Reflection 4. Presence of reflective forms 54.4% (n = 49) 5. If present, at what level Not reflective Descriptive reflection Dialogic reflection Critical reflection 83.7% (n = 41) 16.3% (n = 8) 0% (n = 0) 0% (n = 0) Feedback Teacher 6. For which competences was feedback provided? Medical Expert Communicator Collaborator Leader Health Advocate Scholar Professional None 85.6% (n = 77) 92.2% (n = 83) 87.7% (n = 79) 87.8% (n = 79) 65.6% (n = 59) 84.4% (n = 76) 94.4% (n = 85) 0% (n = 0) 7. Specificity Was the feedback provided specific enough? 27.8% (n = 25) 8. Focus Did the feedback provided have an appropriate focus? 91.1% (n = 82) 9. Purpose Was the feedback provided in line with the purpose of the specific form? 58.9% (n = 53) 10. Source Were the criteria/source upon which the feedback was based clear? 57.8% (n = 52) 11. Level Did the provided feedback give insight into the level the traineemust attain? 13.3% (n = 12) Feedback Supervisor 13. For which competences was feedback provided? Medical Expert Communicator Collaborator Leader Health Advocate Scholar Professional None 86.7% (n = 78) 76.7% (n = 69) 37.8% (n = 34) 34.4% (n = 31) 21.1% (n = 19) 21.1% (n = 19) 36.7% (n = 33) 1.1% (n = 1) 14. Specificity Was the feedback provided specific enough? 35.6% (n = 32)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw